<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Ready For The Mac Tablet &#8211; It&#8217;s A Cert, Not A Rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510189</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510189</guid>
		<description>Yes - pen type devices are, on the surface, a lot easier to carry around; and Livescribe, in particular, seems like a neat idea in terms of capabilities.

They&#039;re not perfect, though.  These kind of digital pens tend to be a pain to work with in &quot;real life&quot;.  Either you have to attach a big clunky detector to the top of the page you&#039;re writing on, to detect pen movements; or you have to use special paper with dots on, so the pen itself can work out where it is.

So a tablet form-factor computer isn&#039;t actually particularly inconvenient compared to the funky pens.  Also with a full laptop computer available, there is also a huge potential  range of things that could be done for making the most of the lecture.   I&#039;m not sure how far along Universities are in their thinking in regard of that kind of thing.

If I was an undergraduate today, I think I&#039;d be wanting to take my laptop in to lectures.   Although, I do admit that would be mainly for the IRC back channel, the ability to surf the web, and for playing multi-player video games during the super-boring lectures ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; pen type devices are, on the surface, a lot easier to carry around; and Livescribe, in particular, seems like a neat idea in terms of capabilities.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not perfect, though.  These kind of digital pens tend to be a pain to work with in &#8220;real life&#8221;.  Either you have to attach a big clunky detector to the top of the page you&#8217;re writing on, to detect pen movements; or you have to use special paper with dots on, so the pen itself can work out where it is.</p>
<p>So a tablet form-factor computer isn&#8217;t actually particularly inconvenient compared to the funky pens.  Also with a full laptop computer available, there is also a huge potential  range of things that could be done for making the most of the lecture.   I&#8217;m not sure how far along Universities are in their thinking in regard of that kind of thing.</p>
<p>If I was an undergraduate today, I think I&#8217;d be wanting to take my laptop in to lectures.   Although, I do admit that would be mainly for the IRC back channel, the ability to surf the web, and for playing multi-player video games during the super-boring lectures <img src='http://www.psynixis.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510174</guid>
		<description>Ok good point about the educational use - however students maybe better off with a fly or livescribe pen type device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok good point about the educational use &#8211; however students maybe better off with a fly or livescribe pen type device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510127</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510127</guid>
		<description>Well, a large part of Apple&#039;s traditional market is educational.   I think students attending lectures could find this kind of thing pretty useful.

As for the iPhone and speech to text, there&#039;s already a third-party app that does that:

http://www.crunchbase.com/product/jott-iphone-app

Not sure how well it works, though, particularly in terms of length of recordings it can deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, a large part of Apple&#8217;s traditional market is educational.   I think students attending lectures could find this kind of thing pretty useful.</p>
<p>As for the iPhone and speech to text, there&#8217;s already a third-party app that does that:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/product/jott-iphone-app" rel="nofollow">http://www.crunchbase.com/product/jott-iphone-app</a></p>
<p>Not sure how well it works, though, particularly in terms of length of recordings it can deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510126</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510126</guid>
		<description>How many people take notes in meetings outside work? Not a feature for Apple&#039;s traditional target market... now if they had a speech to text function on the iPhone then that might be useful in meetings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many people take notes in meetings outside work? Not a feature for Apple&#8217;s traditional target market&#8230; now if they had a speech to text function on the iPhone then that might be useful in meetings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510104</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510104</guid>
		<description>Mr X wrote:&lt;i&gt;
&quot;Hand writing recognition: Do we really need that? - do you find yourself using the handwriting recognition for your emails or do you simply just type?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

The thing is - I would have agreed with you, if I hadn&#039;t seen &quot;regular&quot; people&#039;s reaction to using hand-writing recognition on Vista Tablet PC touch screens.    They REALLY LOVE it! A favourite use-case is taking notes in meetings (rather than writing e-mails).   The point is - the hand-writing recognition works so well, you can really scribble away in an almost unreadable way, and it still gets the writing nearly 100% correct.

Lots of people are predicting a consumer device along the lines you suggest, though.  You might well be right!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr X wrote:<i><br />
&#8220;Hand writing recognition: Do we really need that? &#8211; do you find yourself using the handwriting recognition for your emails or do you simply just type?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>The thing is &#8211; I would have agreed with you, if I hadn&#8217;t seen &#8220;regular&#8221; people&#8217;s reaction to using hand-writing recognition on Vista Tablet PC touch screens.    They REALLY LOVE it! A favourite use-case is taking notes in meetings (rather than writing e-mails).   The point is &#8211; the hand-writing recognition works so well, you can really scribble away in an almost unreadable way, and it still gets the writing nearly 100% correct.</p>
<p>Lots of people are predicting a consumer device along the lines you suggest, though.  You might well be right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-510082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-510082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what makes you think that it would have a pressure sensitive device that does handwriting recognition:

pressure sensitive - as you say Wacom already do this well - if your a professional/serious artist then your probably going to be better off with a specific piece of hardware? Also it&#039;s clearly a niche area - the PC already does this well I believe in the tablet form and it&#039;s never really hit the main stream.

Hand writing recognition: Do we really need that? - do you find yourself using the handwriting recognition for your emails or do you simply just type? ie drawing aside, isn&#039;t the best way to input information into a computer still typing?

My bet is that it won&#039;t have those features, that the work will have gone into making the user interface of the OS and key apps &#039;finger friendly&#039; (TM)

That&#039;s potentially a lot of work to get right - if you look back at the recent redesigns of some of the iLife apps - is iPhoto &amp; iMovie more finger friendly now than before? Certainly they simplified the interfaces.

Maybe now, finally, putting cover-flow finder view into leopard makes sense.... or maybe it doesn&#039;t have the finder at all...?

With multi-touch and a device potentially large enough to use both hands there is the potential to create a whole new human/computer interface paradigm - we will see how far they go/have got.

One of the interesting aspects is the timing - if the rumour is true - launch around Sep/Oct  basically means  that it appears to going to be launched *without* significant third party involvement means that either:
1. Current apps will simply work with the gestures - but not fit that well  ( doesn&#039;t seem very Apple ) or
2. It will be closed like the iTouch/iPhone - aimed at a specific market niche - &quot;settee computing&quot; (TM) - web browsing, email, chat, perhaps some iLife type apps, music, movies and games.

It reminds me of some of the reviews of this years E3 - all the game journo&#039;s and attendees really didn&#039;t like the stuff on show - people even got up and left during the Nintendo keynote! - the point being Nintendo showed loads of casual gaming stuff - not the sort of thing the audience at E3 is interested in - but the sort of thing that sells by the bucket loads. 

Nintendo have got it - so I think have Apple - now&#039;s the time to make a true consumer device - geeks may be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what makes you think that it would have a pressure sensitive device that does handwriting recognition:</p>
<p>pressure sensitive &#8211; as you say Wacom already do this well &#8211; if your a professional/serious artist then your probably going to be better off with a specific piece of hardware? Also it&#8217;s clearly a niche area &#8211; the PC already does this well I believe in the tablet form and it&#8217;s never really hit the main stream.</p>
<p>Hand writing recognition: Do we really need that? &#8211; do you find yourself using the handwriting recognition for your emails or do you simply just type? ie drawing aside, isn&#8217;t the best way to input information into a computer still typing?</p>
<p>My bet is that it won&#8217;t have those features, that the work will have gone into making the user interface of the OS and key apps &#8216;finger friendly&#8217; (TM)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s potentially a lot of work to get right &#8211; if you look back at the recent redesigns of some of the iLife apps &#8211; is iPhoto &amp; iMovie more finger friendly now than before? Certainly they simplified the interfaces.</p>
<p>Maybe now, finally, putting cover-flow finder view into leopard makes sense&#8230;. or maybe it doesn&#8217;t have the finder at all&#8230;?</p>
<p>With multi-touch and a device potentially large enough to use both hands there is the potential to create a whole new human/computer interface paradigm &#8211; we will see how far they go/have got.</p>
<p>One of the interesting aspects is the timing &#8211; if the rumour is true &#8211; launch around Sep/Oct  basically means  that it appears to going to be launched *without* significant third party involvement means that either:<br />
1. Current apps will simply work with the gestures &#8211; but not fit that well  ( doesn&#8217;t seem very Apple ) or<br />
2. It will be closed like the iTouch/iPhone &#8211; aimed at a specific market niche &#8211; &#8220;settee computing&#8221; (TM) &#8211; web browsing, email, chat, perhaps some iLife type apps, music, movies and games.</p>
<p>It reminds me of some of the reviews of this years E3 &#8211; all the game journo&#8217;s and attendees really didn&#8217;t like the stuff on show &#8211; people even got up and left during the Nintendo keynote! &#8211; the point being Nintendo showed loads of casual gaming stuff &#8211; not the sort of thing the audience at E3 is interested in &#8211; but the sort of thing that sells by the bucket loads. </p>
<p>Nintendo have got it &#8211; so I think have Apple &#8211; now&#8217;s the time to make a true consumer device &#8211; geeks may be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-495290</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-495290</guid>
		<description>Ah cool - I didn&#039;t know that!  Not much required, then, for Apple to make a tablet-style Macbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah cool &#8211; I didn&#8217;t know that!  Not much required, then, for Apple to make a tablet-style Macbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asam Bashir</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/07/22/get-ready-for-the-mac-tablet-its-a-cert-not-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-491443</link>
		<dc:creator>Asam Bashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=462#comment-491443</guid>
		<description>Tablet features are built-in Mac OS X as well, for years, just plug in a Wacom tablet or similar and you&#039;ll see the InkWell pref pane appear in System Preferences. Apple did invent handwriting recognition with the Newton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tablet features are built-in Mac OS X as well, for years, just plug in a Wacom tablet or similar and you&#8217;ll see the InkWell pref pane appear in System Preferences. Apple did invent handwriting recognition with the Newton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
