Is Google Android Copying Apple iPhone?
Up until today, one of the criticisms of Android was that the “desktop” looked really clunky. That’s all changed. It’s looking much sleeker now. Check out what are the first demos of the new-look Android.
OK - so you’ve checked out the demos. Welcome back! What were your first reactions when watching them? Mine were (in order):
- Well, at the very least, Android is looking a hell of lot better than it did
- The particular device they’re using for the demo seems to run Android pretty quickly… so, the demos run well - which is a start!
- Hmmmmm… it sure looks like they’ve been almost totally focused on copying Apple’s work with iPhone.
- Why are they showing a demo of Pacman? Surely, they have enough knowledge of the mobile space to know that every classic old video game ever developed has run perfectly for years on probably billions cheap Java ME enabled feature phones.
The first two points above are definitely positives for Android - it looks to be coming along really well technically as a mobile platform The last point is a bit odd, but not too important - it’s just a really surprising of choice of demo. Having said that, it might suggest that Google hasn’t yet attracted big games developers to develop new games for Android, in the way Apple has done successfully with iPhone.
However, I think it’s the third bullet point that’s most important. I defy anyone to watch those demos, and not think, “iPhone”. Is that a good thing? Well, I’m not so sure it is. The question is this: how are handset makers and mobile operators going to persuade consumers to buy an Android phone if the value proposition in the minds of customers is, “This is just like an iPhone!”? Because if they do think that, the potential customers will say, “Well, I think I’d prefer the original iPhone rather than a copy; but thanks anyway.”
Asam Bashir wrote:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20080122796&OS=20080122796&RS=20080122796
Touch Screen Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Determining Commands by Applying Heuristics
Jobs; Steven P. ; et al.
Probably time for Apple and Google to have a little meeting and see if they can come up with some licensing agreement or exchange of services.
Posted 30 May 2008 at 7:47 pm ¶
simon wrote:
It’s going to be interesting to see if Apple uses its patents to try to block major competitors from making handsets. I’d imagine it would be pretty tricky to stop companies like Nokia. They have strong IP portfolios of their own around mobile. So, both companies are likely to be infringing each other’s IP… in that case, the result is that companies simply cross-license their patent portfolios.
Posted 31 May 2008 at 8:06 am ¶
Mr X wrote:
The web browser - which engine?
Is webkit taking over? I notice there is even a java front end port - http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ixmal/archive/2008/05/introducing_jwe.html
Posted 31 May 2008 at 4:23 pm ¶
simon wrote:
Webkit is becoming increasingly important both for rendering HTML and as a JavaScript engine. Apple uses it for Macs and iPhone; Adobe uses it for AIR; Sun is using it for JavaFX; and Nokia uses for their smartphones
Some people think Mozilla really dropped the ball here….
Posted 31 May 2008 at 4:36 pm ¶