<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will JavaFX Be A Big Story At JavaOne 2008?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/#comment-346323</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=418#comment-346323</guid>
		<description>Interesting vid... Joshy seems pretty excited about what's going to be announced at JavaOne this year!

You make an excellent point about improving the underlying Java SE platform.  Sun is well on the way to delivering something pretty impressive on this aspect - still some bugs to squash, but they seem to be doing a pretty great job (at least on Windows XP and Vista).

For the first time in the history of Java, applets are starting to look genuinely interesting as a platform for delivering real (rich internet) applications. That actually buys Sun some time to get JavaFX Script right.   As you know, it's perfectly possible to build amazing graphical user interfaces by using Java.   With "Update 10" it will be possible to build amazing applets and deploy them inside browsers, and the new plug-in should allow interesting interactions between applet and browser. 

As for the JavaFX Designer tool, if it's possible, I think Sun pretty much *has* to demo it at JavaOne this year - it's going to be such an important aspect of making the whole JavaFX platform a success.

It's fine (although not ideal) if it won't be at Version 1.0 for another year.   It's fine (although not ideal) if there's nothing for developers to download and play with.  But, to have nothing at *all* to show a year after announcing would be a little weak.

Having said that, if it's not at a stage where they can do an impressive demo, then so be it.   They'll just have to hold their hands up and say it's taking longer to build the JavaFX platform that they'd hoped, but they're taking their time to get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting vid&#8230; Joshy seems pretty excited about what&#8217;s going to be announced at JavaOne this year!</p>
<p>You make an excellent point about improving the underlying Java SE platform.  Sun is well on the way to delivering something pretty impressive on this aspect - still some bugs to squash, but they seem to be doing a pretty great job (at least on Windows XP and Vista).</p>
<p>For the first time in the history of Java, applets are starting to look genuinely interesting as a platform for delivering real (rich internet) applications. That actually buys Sun some time to get JavaFX Script right.   As you know, it&#8217;s perfectly possible to build amazing graphical user interfaces by using Java.   With &#8220;Update 10&#8243; it will be possible to build amazing applets and deploy them inside browsers, and the new plug-in should allow interesting interactions between applet and browser. </p>
<p>As for the JavaFX Designer tool, if it&#8217;s possible, I think Sun pretty much *has* to demo it at JavaOne this year - it&#8217;s going to be such an important aspect of making the whole JavaFX platform a success.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fine (although not ideal) if it won&#8217;t be at Version 1.0 for another year.   It&#8217;s fine (although not ideal) if there&#8217;s nothing for developers to download and play with.  But, to have nothing at *all* to show a year after announcing would be a little weak.</p>
<p>Having said that, if it&#8217;s not at a stage where they can do an impressive demo, then so be it.   They&#8217;ll just have to hold their hands up and say it&#8217;s taking longer to build the JavaFX platform that they&#8217;d hoped, but they&#8217;re taking their time to get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/#comment-346180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=418#comment-346180</guid>
		<description>It's not completely true that their has been no news on the designer - watch the video on this blog entry
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/joshy/archive/2008/04/back_from_austr.html
skip to 7 mins in and he basically say's he will be proud of the Java FX designer - this time NEXT year and a little later on talks about he's not sure yet whether  they will be talking about it a Java One this year. That basically says they are nowhere near shipping. 

As you say much progress has been made on JavaFX script but there is still a lot to do - they have been focusing on the basics. For these sorts of things it's always a trade off between rushing something out quickly and having to live with the mistakes you make for a long time, or taking the time to make it real good but risking it being irrelevant. 

The really good thing has been the overall focus - as Joshy alludes to in the video - they have trying to improve all aspects, deployment, underlying Java2D as well as more designer friendly dev tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not completely true that their has been no news on the designer - watch the video on this blog entry<br />
<a href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/joshy/archive/2008/04/back_from_austr.html" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.java.net/blog/joshy/archive/2008/04/back_from_austr.html</a><br />
skip to 7 mins in and he basically say&#8217;s he will be proud of the Java FX designer - this time NEXT year and a little later on talks about he&#8217;s not sure yet whether  they will be talking about it a Java One this year. That basically says they are nowhere near shipping. </p>
<p>As you say much progress has been made on JavaFX script but there is still a lot to do - they have been focusing on the basics. For these sorts of things it&#8217;s always a trade off between rushing something out quickly and having to live with the mistakes you make for a long time, or taking the time to make it real good but risking it being irrelevant. </p>
<p>The really good thing has been the overall focus - as Joshy alludes to in the video - they have trying to improve all aspects, deployment, underlying Java2D as well as more designer friendly dev tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/#comment-346136</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=418#comment-346136</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see why they'd feature it at JavaOne - people will be interested to hear about it and maybe see a demo. It's nothing to do with Sun though.

The devil is always in the detail with these kind of translators.   The bottom line is: if it works well, then by definition it's a great way for Java developers to be able to instantly develop iPhone apps, without having to spend time learning the iPhone SDK and Objective C.

That's &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; a hell of a big "if" though... it would be majorly impressive piece of work by Innaworks if this product *did* work well.

Actually, I thought an interesting part of Sun's comment about this was that they suggested they were in discussions in with Apple about how to include Java on iPhone.  Having said that, it's possibly not all that interesting - my guess is that the "discussions" aren't all that productive ;-)

By the way, I'm pretty sure plenty of Mac developers *would* be intererested in having great Java support in iPhone (not crappy Java support, obviously).   When iPhone was first announced,  Apple's was so over-run with Mac developers asking for Java support on iPhone that Apple had to ask people to stop requesting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see why they&#8217;d feature it at JavaOne - people will be interested to hear about it and maybe see a demo. It&#8217;s nothing to do with Sun though.</p>
<p>The devil is always in the detail with these kind of translators.   The bottom line is: if it works well, then by definition it&#8217;s a great way for Java developers to be able to instantly develop iPhone apps, without having to spend time learning the iPhone SDK and Objective C.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s <i>really</i> a hell of a big &#8220;if&#8221; though&#8230; it would be majorly impressive piece of work by Innaworks if this product *did* work well.</p>
<p>Actually, I thought an interesting part of Sun&#8217;s comment about this was that they suggested they were in discussions in with Apple about how to include Java on iPhone.  Having said that, it&#8217;s possibly not all that interesting - my guess is that the &#8220;discussions&#8221; aren&#8217;t all that productive <img src='http://www.psynixis.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m pretty sure plenty of Mac developers *would* be intererested in having great Java support in iPhone (not crappy Java support, obviously).   When iPhone was first announced,  Apple&#8217;s was so over-run with Mac developers asking for Java support on iPhone that Apple had to ask people to stop requesting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asam Bashir</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/04/24/will-javafx-be-a-big-story-again-at-javaone-2008/#comment-346078</link>
		<dc:creator>Asam Bashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=418#comment-346078</guid>
		<description>Seems to save-face, after ridiculous post-iPhone SDK announcement, they will be making some kind of announcement using Innaworks alcheMO algorithm - but it's a waste of time, Mac developers don't need or want it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to save-face, after ridiculous post-iPhone SDK announcement, they will be making some kind of announcement using Innaworks alcheMO algorithm - but it&#8217;s a waste of time, Mac developers don&#8217;t need or want it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
