<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun / MySQL - Acquisition Rationale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219184</guid>
		<description>They have been looking at this area for a while - for example their work on PostgreSQL on solaris

http://www.sun.com/software/products/postgresql/index.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have been looking at this area for a while - for example their work on PostgreSQL on solaris</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sun.com/software/products/postgresql/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com/software/products/postgresql/index.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219067</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219067</guid>
		<description>Yes - I bet Sun would just love to take a bite out of Oracle's ever-growing revenues with their new offering.  

There are certainly many companies  that choose to run expensive Oracle software when they could actually do just as well with MySQL.  For sure Sun will see that as an opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - I bet Sun would just love to take a bite out of Oracle&#8217;s ever-growing revenues with their new offering.  </p>
<p>There are certainly many companies  that choose to run expensive Oracle software when they could actually do just as well with MySQL.  For sure Sun will see that as an opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr X</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219045</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2008/01/16/sun-mysql-acquistion-rationale/#comment-219045</guid>
		<description>Or it could be a 'two can play at that game' two fingers at Oracle who shipped 11g on linux first, have their own OS and virtualisation and are even writing a zfs like fs ( btfs ) - and have not yet shipped 11g for solaris x64/x86.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it could be a &#8216;two can play at that game&#8217; two fingers at Oracle who shipped 11g on linux first, have their own OS and virtualisation and are even writing a zfs like fs ( btfs ) - and have not yet shipped 11g for solaris x64/x86.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
