<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Jobs Announces iPhone SDK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-195680</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-195680</guid>
		<description>Jobs has already suggested that there will, at the very least, be some kind of digital signing needed for third-party iPhone apps.  So, it doesn't look like it will be uncontrolled.

I'm going to be really interested to see if Apple has done a good job with this.  There's lots of ways they could screw this up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jobs has already suggested that there will, at the very least, be some kind of digital signing needed for third-party iPhone apps.  So, it doesn&#8217;t look like it will be uncontrolled.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be really interested to see if Apple has done a good job with this.  There&#8217;s lots of ways they could screw this up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-195097</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-195097</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was agreeing with Steve's position that *unlimited* and by inference *uncontrolled* third-party apps on a *phone* is a bad idea, and I still think it is. I highly doubt the iPod SDK will allow for the same level of development as you get with Mac OS X on a *general purpose* computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was agreeing with Steve&#8217;s position that *unlimited* and by inference *uncontrolled* third-party apps on a *phone* is a bad idea, and I still think it is. I highly doubt the iPod SDK will allow for the same level of development as you get with Mac OS X on a *general purpose* computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asam Bashir</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-131790</link>
		<dc:creator>Asam Bashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/10/17/steve-jobs-announces-iphone-sdk/#comment-131790</guid>
		<description>Some of us though did say that when Jobs had a proper plan for an SDK and if the market was right then he would release - Apple developers have obviously been working on Leopard release (Offical 26th Oct Launch) and so maybe now they're looking into the iPhone/iTouch as an open developer platform before they set priorites for Mac OS X 10.6.

There have been more rumors about other touch devices, possibly the Newton evolved - it would make sence for say a MacBook with no keyboard at all but a touch screen instead. When you want a keyboard can always add a bluetooth one, or maybe even have some nice design where the keyboard can be removed by some clever mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us though did say that when Jobs had a proper plan for an SDK and if the market was right then he would release - Apple developers have obviously been working on Leopard release (Offical 26th Oct Launch) and so maybe now they&#8217;re looking into the iPhone/iTouch as an open developer platform before they set priorites for Mac OS X 10.6.</p>
<p>There have been more rumors about other touch devices, possibly the Newton evolved - it would make sence for say a MacBook with no keyboard at all but a touch screen instead. When you want a keyboard can always add a bluetooth one, or maybe even have some nice design where the keyboard can be removed by some clever mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
