An Monkey?!
In a post entitled, “How to avoid sounding like an monkey” (sic), Dave Winer explains that anyone who uses terms from a branch of mathematics called, Graph Theory, in the context of social networking sounds like an “idiot”. Err…. what?
Graph theory is a well-established field, having been around for more than two hundred years. The first ideas about network graphs were actually published in 1736 by the fabulous mathematician, Leonhard Euler. So, why the anti-intellectualism from Dave? There is absolutely nothing wrong with people discussing graph theory in the context of social networks; and certainly the very act of doing so does not make people “sound like idiots”, as Dave would have it. Quite the opposite, in fact. I would assert that smart people would be able to see substantial potential value in applying graph theoretic techniques to social networking, particularly in the area of search.
Like Dave, I would encourage people to stand up for their rights to understand technology. Unlike Dave, however, I’d encourage people to do that through being willing learning about new things, not by trying to close down discussions in areas they don’t understand.
Scott wrote:
I think he meantScoble, not just anyone.
Posted 23 Sep 2007 at 2:47 pm ¶
simon wrote:
LOL! I see… well… hmmmm… I’m saying nothing…
Posted 23 Sep 2007 at 3:26 pm ¶
Ajay Mishra wrote:
Graph Theory etc is cool and stuff. And yes, there is this Anti -intellectual stuff in the USA ( we elected Bush - that evidence should suffice).
But me thinks –> this guy maybe talking of over use and abuse. Kind of like leadership skills –> being around longer than squeezed cheese & slcied bread were invented.. But anyone talking about the leadership of Dolphins and Chengiz Khan - should - definitely be.. **** ( oh well.. I cant be politically correct –> self censorship)
Posted 30 Dec 2007 at 11:34 pm ¶