<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusion Over Java On iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/01/17/confusion-over-java-on-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/01/17/confusion-over-java-on-iphone/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asam Bashir</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/01/17/confusion-over-java-on-iphone/#comment-16158</link>
		<dc:creator>Asam Bashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2007/01/17/confusion-over-java-on-iphone/#comment-16158</guid>
		<description>There's a lot of misinformation being put out there, by worried competitors, even Apple is making fun of this in it's new ad, 'Sabotage':

http://www.apple.com/getamac/

I can't see Apple revealing any more cards and a SDK now until they've sorted out UK/European carriers - probably negotiating with either Orange or Vodaphone - I'd put my bet on Orange at the moment, as the iPhone would fit in nicely with converged Orange mobile and broadband package.

Rather then just opening up the platform, I can understand a possible stratergy would be to sell 3rd part applications via iTunes store, that way, developers can write new applications, but Apple gets a cut through selling and approving it. 

Also, since this is a UNIX platform, Apple would need to think about security deeply, to avoid the kind of virus the Simbian platform has seen. Security a very important part of the overall marketing of the Apple brand. This may be another reason to keep the platform closed for now, 

http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2007/01/malware_for_the_apple_iphone.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of misinformation being put out there, by worried competitors, even Apple is making fun of this in it&#8217;s new ad, &#8216;Sabotage&#8217;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/getamac/</a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see Apple revealing any more cards and a SDK now until they&#8217;ve sorted out UK/European carriers - probably negotiating with either Orange or Vodaphone - I&#8217;d put my bet on Orange at the moment, as the iPhone would fit in nicely with converged Orange mobile and broadband package.</p>
<p>Rather then just opening up the platform, I can understand a possible stratergy would be to sell 3rd part applications via iTunes store, that way, developers can write new applications, but Apple gets a cut through selling and approving it. </p>
<p>Also, since this is a UNIX platform, Apple would need to think about security deeply, to avoid the kind of virus the Simbian platform has seen. Security a very important part of the overall marketing of the Apple brand. This may be another reason to keep the platform closed for now, </p>
<p><a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2007/01/malware_for_the_apple_iphone.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2007/01/malware_for_the_apple_iphone.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
