<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wassup With Web 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/</link>
	<description>Simon Brocklehurst's Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Brocklehurst's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Brocklehurst's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=14#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Ben and Mena Show&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;

	So&#8230; the &#8220;big story&#8221;to come out of the recent Les Blogs 2.0 conference was &#8220;The Ben and Mena Show&#8221;.  If you&#8217;ve an eye for trivia, you will know about it by now:  Mena Trott - CEO of Six Apart - was giving a talk.  Be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Ben and Mena Show&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	So&#8230; the &#8220;big story&#8221;to come out of the recent Les Blogs 2.0 conference was &#8220;The Ben and Mena Show&#8221;.  If you&#8217;ve an eye for trivia, you will know about it by now:  Mena Trott - CEO of Six Apart - was giving a talk.  Be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=14#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Interesting that your Dell box didn't have a JRE installed - I had thought all Dell boxes were supposed to ship with JREs (Dell and Sun signed an agreement for this in 2003).  Assuming you don't wipe all PCs and install a standard image at your company, that's genuine surprise to me.

Ultimately, I don't think we're too far apart in our views on the misuse of applets.   I can quite understand your frustrations with understanding of good user interface design being a scarce commodity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that your Dell box didn&#8217;t have a JRE installed - I had thought all Dell boxes were supposed to ship with JREs (Dell and Sun signed an agreement for this in 2003).  Assuming you don&#8217;t wipe all PCs and install a standard image at your company, that&#8217;s genuine surprise to me.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re too far apart in our views on the misuse of applets.   I can quite understand your frustrations with understanding of good user interface design being a scarce commodity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard D. LeCour</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard D. LeCour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=14#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Haha! "simon says:" Funny!

Maybe so, but I just purchased three new PCs (namebrand, two marketed for business use, other marketed for home use). None had a JRE installed. My new Dell box at work didn't have a JRE on it either. Score: 0 out of 4. So, Sun has a lot more work to do if they want applets to be the next AJAX (so to speak)

I completely agree with the points of availability of faster hardware and increased RAM and broadband speed, and Java is getting better all the time -- but increased performance is not an excuse to use a technology when something simple/ordinary will do. The Internet certainly does not need more scrolling text ticker or water ripple effect applets. And why create an applet that is a calendar control, a menu, or rotates banners when there are much simpler implementations. Use applets where appropriate is my main point: games, 2D or 3D applications, animation, client side rendering, apps that need realtime response (chat, GPS, etc)...

My rambling stemmed from talks with an engineering department that created a report query page with an applet (?!?!) that should have been created with plain old DHTML instead. Lazy, and annoying to the end user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! &#8220;simon says:&#8221; Funny!</p>
<p>Maybe so, but I just purchased three new PCs (namebrand, two marketed for business use, other marketed for home use). None had a JRE installed. My new Dell box at work didn&#8217;t have a JRE on it either. Score: 0 out of 4. So, Sun has a lot more work to do if they want applets to be the next AJAX (so to speak)</p>
<p>I completely agree with the points of availability of faster hardware and increased RAM and broadband speed, and Java is getting better all the time &#8212; but increased performance is not an excuse to use a technology when something simple/ordinary will do. The Internet certainly does not need more scrolling text ticker or water ripple effect applets. And why create an applet that is a calendar control, a menu, or rotates banners when there are much simpler implementations. Use applets where appropriate is my main point: games, 2D or 3D applications, animation, client side rendering, apps that need realtime response (chat, GPS, etc)&#8230;</p>
<p>My rambling stemmed from talks with an engineering department that created a report query page with an applet (?!?!) that should have been created with plain old DHTML instead. Lazy, and annoying to the end user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Richard - you're 100% correct when you say that critical to success of the whole client-side Java platform is the presence of a modern JRE on a computer.  But, Sun has been working hard to ensure that Windows PCs and Macs ship with modern JREs for a couple of years now.   The level of deployment of JREs is a big success story - and one that many haven't kept up to date with (including Google's CEO, if you watched what he said at the recent Sun/Google press conference).

So, when I say that technologies improve with time, I don't mean just that the technologies themselves improve. I mean too that the environment that technologies find themselves in changes over time.  In this case: modern JREs are becoming pervasive; CPUs on the "average" desktop run 5 to 10 times faster than they did when applets first hit the web;  the same kind of increase is true for RAM too; and broadband connections have high penetration into many parts of the world - in 1996 everyone was on dial-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard - you&#8217;re 100% correct when you say that critical to success of the whole client-side Java platform is the presence of a modern JRE on a computer.  But, Sun has been working hard to ensure that Windows PCs and Macs ship with modern JREs for a couple of years now.   The level of deployment of JREs is a big success story - and one that many haven&#8217;t kept up to date with (including Google&#8217;s CEO, if you watched what he said at the recent Sun/Google press conference).</p>
<p>So, when I say that technologies improve with time, I don&#8217;t mean just that the technologies themselves improve. I mean too that the environment that technologies find themselves in changes over time.  In this case: modern JREs are becoming pervasive; CPUs on the &#8220;average&#8221; desktop run 5 to 10 times faster than they did when applets first hit the web;  the same kind of increase is true for RAM too; and broadband connections have high penetration into many parts of the world - in 1996 everyone was on dial-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard D. LeCour</title>
		<link>http://www.psynixis.com/blog/2005/10/10/wassup-with-web-20/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard D. LeCour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=14#comment-5</guid>
		<description>It's not about whether or not technologies improve with time. It's what people do with technologies. My rambling concerning how bad applets are is more about the ever-present trend of developers that use technology because they *can*, without consideration as to whether they *should*.

While I am not necessarily a proponent of either methodology, AJAX support is built into new browsers, while applets require a separate download of a JRE. To release a new paradigm -- whatever that may be -- at least 80-90% of browsers must support it without downloading something extra to use it. Broad support for applets will likely only occur if Firefox or IE (yeah, right!) were to include a current JRE within the download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about whether or not technologies improve with time. It&#8217;s what people do with technologies. My rambling concerning how bad applets are is more about the ever-present trend of developers that use technology because they *can*, without consideration as to whether they *should*.</p>
<p>While I am not necessarily a proponent of either methodology, AJAX support is built into new browsers, while applets require a separate download of a JRE. To release a new paradigm &#8212; whatever that may be &#8212; at least 80-90% of browsers must support it without downloading something extra to use it. Broad support for applets will likely only occur if Firefox or IE (yeah, right!) were to include a current JRE within the download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
